{"id":454,"date":"2017-08-21T01:54:32","date_gmt":"2017-08-21T01:54:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/legalthesaurus.org\/?page_id=454"},"modified":"2017-08-21T01:54:32","modified_gmt":"2017-08-21T01:54:32","slug":"example-compounds","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/es.legalthesaurus.org\/examples\/example-compounds\/","title":{"rendered":"Example \u201cCompounds\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Example \u201cCompounds\u201d<\/h1>\n<\/header>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

Table of contents<\/h3>\n
    \n
  1. Introduction<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. DD8723-5 XML Format<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Alphabetical display<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Hierarchical display<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
    <\/div>\n

    <\/a>Introduction<\/h3>\n
    \n

    This example has been set up only to test compound terms, so it has very few features or relationships other than USE+ and UF+. All the preferred terms have concept identifiers (tagged CID), but since the compound terms represent concepts that are not really \u201cin\u201d the thesaurus, they do not have concept identifiers. All the terms do have term identifiers (TID).<\/p>\n

    A classified display is irrelevant for this example, and a hierarchical display seems trivial, but has been included after the alphabetical display, for completeness.<\/p>\n

    For this example, testing includes:<\/p>\n